Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Abstract. Oxidative potential (OP) of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) is a metric of increasing scientific interest because it potentially links chemical particle properties to particle health effects. OP has been recently introduced as a recommended monitoring metric in the European Air Quality Directive. However, inconsistent protocols in the existing literature make it difficult to compare results across studies. Following a 2023 inter-laboratory comparison that focused on PM OP measured using the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay, this paper presents the findings and lessons learnt from a second inter-laboratory study focused on the ascorbic acid assay (OP-AA). In this study, twenty-six laboratories worldwide quantified OP of four PM filter samples and of one chemical compound to evaluate the entire analytical chain, including the extraction step, using a simplified OP-AA protocol. While most laboratories produced repeatable internal results when applying the simplified protocol, significant discrepancies between participants highlight the need for each laboratory to carefully evaluate deviations from the simplified OP-AA protocol. Over half of the 26 participants achieved satisfactory results, suggesting that the protocol is suitable for large-scale implementation. Beyond assessing performance, this work investigates technical, analytical, and mathematical refinements to measurement protocols. Building on the first DTT assay study, this second inter-laboratory comparison represents a significant step toward harmonizing OP assays, and provides specific recommendations to ensure consistent future measurements, ready to be applied in the new air quality directive EU 2024/2881.