Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
This dataset contains research data relating to the publication "Relationships between milling input energy and chemical reactivity for mechano-chemical activation of clays". The contents of the files are summarised below.
README_2025-12-08.txt
Contains a summary of author and license information, and the contents of the other two files.
This workbook contains the datapoints plotted in the figures in the article. Each tab corresponds to an individual figure. The full methodological descriptions are found in the Methods section of the associated research article. Descriptions of the relevant figures are below:
1A R3 chemical reactivity v. modelled energy input for all data1B Example model curves plotting dummy data, showing the effect of changing parameters ΔHmin and kd 1C Fitted curves for the original cumulative heat reactivity data generated in this study, wherein each clay grouping contains only a single source clay. 1D Fitted curves for original and literature-derived data for cumulative heat reactivity, wherein each clay grouping contains >1 source clay. 2 R3 chemical reactivity v. energy per individual collision (ΔEb*), grouped by mineralogy.3A Effect on modelled milling energy input (kJ / g) from changing combinations of continuous variables: ball:powder ratio and rotation speed3B Effect on modelled milling energy input (kJ / g) from changing combinations of continuous variables: ball:powder ratio and milling duration3C Effect on modelled milling energy input (kJ / g) from changing combinations of continuous variables: rotation speed and ball:powder ratio3D Effect on modelled milling energy input (kJ / g) from changing combinations of continuous variables: rotation speed and milling duration3E Effect on modelled milling energy input (kJ / g) from changing combinations of continuous variables: milling duration and ball:powder ratio3F Effect on modelled milling energy input (kJ / g) from changing combinations of continuous variables: milling duration and rotation speed4 Measured energy consumption v. modelled energy input, for data generated in this study. Each series corresponds to a series of milling parameters varying one independent parameter: BPR = ball:powder ratio; RPM = rotation speed (rpm); duration = duration of milling (minutes). 5A R3 chemical reactivity v. measured energy consumption for the data generated in this study5B R3 chemical reactivity v. measured energy consumption for the 1:1 clay data only, generated in this study. Each series corresponds to a series of milling parameters varying one independent parameter: BPR = ball:powder ratio; RPM = rotation speed (rpm); duration = duration of milling (minutes). 6A Activation efficiency metric v. R3 chemical reactivity. The series suffixes represent the series varying each continuous milling parameter: “min” = milling duration; “rpm” = rotation speed; “bpr” = ball:powder ratio. 6B Activation e