Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Perceptual decisions are systematically biased by recent history, producing both attractive and repulsive forms of serial dependence. Previous work suggests that interrupting the perception-action cycle by omitting a response may reduce attractive biases and enhance repulsive ones, but the neural mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. Here, we investigated the EEG correlates of response-requirement effects in serial dependence during visual orientation judgments. Following no-response trials, we confirmed reduced attractive and increased repulsive biases. In parallel, these trials elicited stronger evoked responses on subsequent trials and enhanced neural representations compared with response trials. These findings indicate that interrupting the perception-action cycle promotes a state of reengagement with current sensory input, reshaping the balance between attractive and repulsive serial dependence, and giving rise to distinct electrophysiological signatures.