Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
The power of a set S of object types can be measured as the maximum number n of processes that can solve consensus using only types in S and registers. This number, denoted by h^r_m (S), is called the consensus power of S. The use of failure detectors can however ``boost'' the consensus power of types. This paper addresses the weakest failure detector type booster question, which consists in determining the weakest failure detector D such that, for any set S of types with h_m^r(S)=n, h_m^r(S;D)=n+1. We consider the failure detector \Omega_n (introduced in (Neiger,1995)) which outputs, at each process, a set of at most n processes so that, eventually, all correct processes detect the same set of processes that includes at least one correct process. We prove that \Omega_n is the weakest failure detector type booster for deterministic one-shot types. As an interesting corollary of our result, we show that \Omega_f is the weakest failure detector to boost the power of (f-1)-resilient objects solving consensus.