Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
This work examines the separatrix and Scrape-off-Layer (SOL) characteristics in three scenarios on JET: the Quasi-Continuous Exhaust (QCE) regime, the ITER Baseline scenario, and the X-point Radiator (XPR) regime. All three scenarios are potentially compatible with reactor operations, as they aim to provide power exhaust solutions through different approaches. The QCE regime is distinguished by its generally higher separatrix and SOL collisionality, associating with broader SOL width. These features, combined with the near-double-null (DNX) configuration, introduce several operational challenges on JET. The resulting broader SOL interacts with fast Beam neutrals, contributing to an unfavorable power load on local limiter. The heat load on the Upper Dump Plate Tiles in the QCE regime can be up to 5-6 times higher compared to the other scenarios. Additionally, the energy distribution shows a pronounced inner-outer asymmetry in QCE pulses, with the energy deposited on the outer limiter being up to four times higher than on the inner limiter. However, through careful operational planning and robust real-time protection system, the power loads were effectively managed within acceptable limits during QCE pulses, enabling successful scientific outcomes. As a result, the QCE regime serves as a case study to illustrate the critical need for integrating physics understanding, risk identification, operational strategies, and robust real-time protection to successfully implement new scenarios for fusion devices.
Patrick Blanchard, Basil Duval, Ambrogio Fasoli, Olivier Sauter, Henri Weisen, Jonathan Graves, Duccio Testa, Federico Alberto Alfredo Felici, Antoine Pierre Emmanuel Alexis Merle, Federico Nespoli, Anna Teplukhina, Hamish William Patten, Samuel Lanthaler, Paulo Giovane Paschoali Pereira Puglia, Eduardo José Lascas Neto, Cristian Sommariva