Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Empirical models have limited accuracy for coupled mixture-environment-geometry-time effects on concrete drying shrinkage. An interpretable machine-learning framework was developed using 42,099 records from the NU Shrinkage-Creep Database, benchmarking nine algorithms under Bayesian optimization and four metaheuristics. GA-LightGBM achieved the best performance, with an RMSE 78.4% lower than GL2000. Bayesian optimization favored GBDT and CatBoost whereas PSO favored MLP, RF, and AdaBoost. SHAP analysis identified drying duration as the dominant variable, revealed a threshold effect of elastic modulus near 30,000 MPa, and showed step-like temperature effects between 20 and 25 °C. External validation on 116 data points from three independent studies yielded R 2 = 0.9627, RMSE = 37.7 με, and MAE = 31.4 με. In two shrinkage-constrained mix-design cases, the surrogate-assisted optimizer yielded mixtures with unit material costs 19.1% and 10.3% lower than feasible baselines under 365-day shrinkage constraints, supported by a graphical user interface.