Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
This paper investigates the accuracy of mean density estimation from direct sensing at link and network levels. Different calculation methods are compared depending on sensor type, probe vehicles or loop detectors, and availability to quantify the magnitude of expected errors. Probe data are essential to reduce the error but accurate density estimation requires high penetration rates, which is hardly true in practice. We enhance the fishing rate method, i.e. using the ratio of probes detected at the loop locations over the loop flow, to estimate density. Accurate density estimation at the link level can only be obtained when probes and loop data are available in real-time. At the network level, accurate density estimations can be obtained when combining loop and probe observations, even if few links capture both data sources. It requires applying the proper analytical formulation to aggregate the local observations, i.e. carefully defining fishing rates at this scale.
Andrii Neronov, Volodymyr Savchenko, Oleg Kalashev
Jan Skaloud, Davide Antonio Cucci, Laurent Valentin Jospin, Kyriaki Mouzakidou, Thibaut Stoltz