Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) remains a diagnostic challenge, as a proportion of patients do not present with obstructive coronary lesions. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a non-invasive tool for coronary assessment, and integrating artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance its diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluates a machine learning (ML) model using a learned fusion approach to identify culprit lesions in high-risk NSTE-ACS patients. This study is a sub-analysis of a prospective, multicenter trial including patients with high-risk NSTE-ACS who underwent CCTA, followed by ICA and fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment in every intermediate stenosis. An ML framework was developed to analyze 2 orthogonal CCTA views of each coronary segment and classify them as culprit or non-culprit, with ICA +/- FFR as gold standards. The model was trained using 5-fold cross-validation and compared against 5 baseline methods, including conventional feature extraction and FFR-CT. Among 80 patients, 514 coronary segments were analyzed, with 63 (12.3%) labeled as culprit. The learned fusion model achieved a sensitivity of 0.55 ± 0.14, specificity of 0.93 ± 0.05, and F1-score of 0.53 ± 0.11. The AUC was 0.84 ± 0.06, matching the performance of FFR-CT (AUC of 0.82 ± 0.08). Our findings demonstrate that the learned fusion approach, based on combining two orthogonal views, achieved a performance level comparable to that of FFR-CT, as shown by the AUC of both techniques. These results confirm that AI-driven CCTA analysis could enhance clinical decision-making in high-risk NSTE-ACS patients, warranting further validation of this method in larger cohorts. Graphical abstract CCTA: coronary computed tomography angiography, FFR: fractional flow reserve, ICA: invasive coronary angiogram, NSTE-ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome PPV: positive predictive value