Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Hardware data prefetching is a latency hiding technique that mitigates the memory wall problem by fetching data blocks into caches before the processor demands them. For high performing state-of-the-art data prefetchers, this increases dynamic and static energy in memory hierarchy, due to increase in number of requests. A trivial way to improve energy-efficiency of hardware prefetchers is to prefetch instructions on the critical path of execution. As criticality-based data prefetching does not degrade performance significantly; this is an ideal approach to solve the energy-efficiency problem. We discuss limitations of existing critical instruction detection techniques and propose a new technique that uses re-order buffer occupancy as a metric to detect critical instructions and performs prefetcher-specific threshold tuning. With our detector, we achieve maximum memory hierarchy energy savings of 12.3% with 1.4% higher performance, for PPF, and average as follows: (i) SPEC CPU 2017 benchmarks: 2.04% lower energy, 0.3% lower performance, for IPCP at L1D, (ii) client/server benchmarks: 4.7% lower energy, 0.15% lower performance, for PPF, (iii) Cloudsuite benchmarks: 2.99% lower energy, 0.36% higher performance, for IPCP at L1D. IPCP and PPF are state-of-the-art data prefetchers.
James Richard Larus, Sahand Kashani, Seyedmahyar Emami
Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Seyed Mohammadhossein Tabatabaee