Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
We designed a 20-minute interactive session on mansplaining and manterrupting reframed as powersplaining. This paper presents the format, the content and the feedback from 8 training sessions carried out in courses in civil engineering, environmental engineering and architecture. As an expression of entitlement to knowledge, powersplaining is presented as a commonplace behavior of competitive study climates typical of engineering studies. Powersplaining helps to explain self-depreciation, self-doubt, decreased engagement and efficacy. It seems that entitlement to knowledge embodies well the negative impact of powersplaining and mansplaining and successfully prepares participants to respond. We also share our experience, as subject experts outside engineering, in gaining access as well as in capturing engineering students' attention. Participants' feedback showed that the training succeeds in equipping them to react and identify powersplaining. This format seems adequate to address gender-biased communication in engineering education.