Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Chemists recurrently utilize "fuzzy'' chemical concepts (e.g. atomic charges, the chemical bond, strain, aromaticity, branching, etc.), which lack unique quantitative assessments but, nonetheless, are frequently employed as tools for understanding the intricacies of chemical behaviour. This tutorial review provides an overview of the computational schemes specifically developed to quantify four of the most commonly employed, yet debated, chemical concepts: the chemical bond, atomic charges, (hyper)conjugation, and molecular strain. The enhanced knowledge gained from these schemes not only helps in the depiction of molecules with unique properties, but also provides breadth to our fundamental understanding of chemistry. Nevertheless, the numerous existing methodologies often result in different interpretations that culminate in discrepancies. Through recent examples in the literature, guidelines are provided which illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of various schemes for each individual concept.
Rizlan Bernier-Latmani, Luciano Andres Abriata, Karin Lederballe Meibom, Margaux Camille Andréa Molinas