How are fast tracks organized in adult and pediatric emergency departments in Switzerland? A cross-sectional survey

BackgroundIn response to the challenges faced by emergency departments (ED), including overcrowding and high patient volumes, Fast Track (FT) systems are designed to optimize patient flow, yet their implementation and impact in Switzerland remain understudied. Our study provides a comprehensive description of Fast Track (FT) processes across both pediatric and adult settings in Switzerland and compares challenges.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey of ED leadership in Switzerland from May to September 2023, using the WHO SARA framework to explore FT processes. The survey included 28 pediatric EDs and their corresponding adult EDs, with questions addressing FT availability, staffing, infrastructure, and operational challenges. Results were analyzed descriptively, providing insights into FT organization and highlighting barriers to implementation and expansion.ResultsThe survey achieved a response rate of 93% (52/56 EDs). Overall, 68% of surveyed hospitals have implemented a FT system, with a higher prevalence in adult EDs (88%) than in pediatric EDs (59%). The absence of FTs in certain pediatric departments was primarily due to structural and personnel constraints. Most FTs are managed internally by hospitals, employing emergency team members, and occasionally general practitioners, reflecting a tailored approach to staffing based on departmental needs.Despite the strategic organization of FTs, operational challenges persist; 45% of respondents identified staff shortages as a major challenge, particularly in pediatric FTs (63%) compared to adult FTs (32%). Financial barriers, including disparities in external physician compensation, remain significant obstacles to FT expansion.Satisfaction levels among EDs with their FT systems were generally high, with improvements in personnel resource allocation and patient flow frequently reported.ResultsThe survey achieved a response rate of 93% (52/56 EDs). Overall, 68% of surveyed hospitals have implemented a FT system, with a higher prevalence in adult EDs (88%) than in pediatric EDs (59%). The absence of FTs in certain pediatric departments was primarily due to structural and personnel constraints. Most FTs are managed internally by hospitals, employing emergency team members, and occasionally general practitioners, reflecting a tailored approach to staffing based on departmental needs.Despite the strategic organization of FTs, operational challenges persist; 45% of respondents identified staff shortages as a major challenge, particularly in pediatric FTs (63%) compared to adult FTs (32%). Financial barriers, including disparities in external physician compensation, remain significant obstacles to FT expansion.Satisfaction levels among EDs with their FT systems were generally high, with improvements in personnel resource allocation and patient flow frequently reported.ResultsThe survey achieved a response rate of 93% (52/56 EDs). Overall, 68% of surveyed hospitals have implemented a FT sys