Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
This paper presents a comparison of methods to quantify the chloride binding capacity for cementitious materials composed of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and Limestone (LS, 0 to 55% replacement). Physical and chemical chloride bindings were investigated to better understand the binding capacity of the different systems and to provide basic information for modelling. Cement pastes samples were exposed to a 0.5 M NaCl solution and their chloride contents were quantified as free ions in pore solution, chemically bound ions in AFm phases, and physically bound ions on Calcium-Aluminum-Silicate-Hydrates (C-A-S--H). Notably, the study showed that (1) considering a solid solution between Friedel's salt and Hemicarboaluminate (He) was necessary for the quantification of chemically bound chlorides in limestone blended system and (2) an accurate estimation of the C-A-S-H content was critical for quantifying physically bound chlorides.
Karen Scrivener, Franco Alberto Zunino Sommariva, Jinfeng Sun