Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
The purpose of this study was to develop a two-compartment metabolic model of brain metabolism to assess oxidative metabolism from [1-C-11] acetate radiotracer experiments, using an approach previously applied in C-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and compared with an one-tissue compartment model previously used in brain [1-C-11] acetate studies. Compared with C-13 MRS studies, C-11 radiotracer measurements provide a single uptake curve representing the sum of all labeled metabolites, without chemical differentiation, but with higher temporal resolution. The reliability of the adjusted metabolic fluxes was analyzed with Monte-Carlo simulations using synthetic C-11 uptake curves, based on a typical arterial input function and previously published values of the neuroglial fluxes V-tca(g), V-x, V-nt, and V-tca(n) measured in dynamic C-13 MRS experiments. Assuming V-x(g)=10xV(tca)(g) and V-x(n)=V-tca(n), it was possible to assess the composite glial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle flux V-gt(g) (Vgtg = V(x)(g)xV(tca)(g)/(V-x(g) + V-tca(g))) and the neurotransmission flux V-nt from C-11 tissue-activity curves obtained within 30 minutes in the rat cortex with a beta-probe after a bolus infusion of [1-C-11] acetate (n = 9), resulting in V-gt(g) = 0.136 +/- 0.042 and V-nt = 0.170 +/- 0.103 mu mol/g per minute (mean +/- s.d. of the group), in good agreement with 13C MRS measurements. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2012) 32, 548-559; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.162; published online 30 November 2011