Publication

Finally the Weakest Failure Detector for Non-Blocking Atomic Commit

Rachid Guerraoui, Petr Kouznetsov
2003
Reports

Résumé

Recent papers [GK03,HT03] define the weakest failure detector for solving the Non-Blocking Atomic Commit problem (NBAC) in a message passing system where processes can fail by crashing and a majority of processes never crash. In this paper, we generalize the result by presenting the weakest failure detector to solve NBAC in any environment, i.e., without any assumption on the number of processes that can crash. We present the result in a modular manner through determining the weakest failure detector for quittable consensus, a variant of consensus introduced by Hadzilacos and Toueg [HT03].

Source officielle

https://infoscience.epfl.ch/entities/publication/0d83b074-003c-4a42-afc0-8fa7cff0635a

À propos de ce résultat

Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.

Graph Chat

Chattez avec Graph Search

Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.

AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.

Rachid Guerraoui, Petr Kouznetsov
2003
Reports

Résumé

Source officielle

https://infoscience.epfl.ch/entities/publication/0d83b074-003c-4a42-afc0-8fa7cff0635a

À propos de ce résultat

Concepts associés (11)

Two-phase commit protocol

In transaction processing, databases, and computer networking, the two-phase commit protocol (2PC, tupac) is a type of atomic commitment protocol (ACP). It is a distributed algorithm that coordinates all the processes that participate in a distributed atomic transaction on whether to commit or abort (roll back) the transaction. This protocol (a specialised type of consensus protocol) achieves its goal even in many cases of temporary system failure (involving either process, network node, communication, etc.

Concurrency control

In information technology and computer science, especially in the fields of computer programming, operating systems, multiprocessors, and databases, concurrency control ensures that correct results for concurrent operations are generated, while getting those results as quickly as possible. Computer systems, both software and hardware, consist of modules, or components. Each component is designed to operate correctly, i.e., to obey or to meet certain consistency rules.

Commitment ordering

Commitment ordering (CO) is a class of interoperable serializability techniques in concurrency control of databases, transaction processing, and related applications. It allows optimistic (non-blocking) implementations. With the proliferation of multi-core processors, CO has also been increasingly utilized in concurrent programming, transactional memory, and software transactional memory (STM) to achieve serializability optimistically. CO is also the name of the resulting transaction schedule (history) property, defined in 1988 with the name dynamic atomicity.

Afficher plus

Publications associées (4)

Afficher plus

Finally the Weakest Failure Detector for Non-Blocking Atomic Commit

Chattez avec Graph Search

Comparing Atomic Broadcast Algorithms in High Latency Networks

The weakest failure detectors to solve Quittable Consensus and Non-Blocking Atomic Commit

Shared Memory vs Message Passing