Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
We propose a new proximal, path-following framework for a class of---possibly non-smooth---constrained convex problems. We consider settings where the non-smooth part is endowed with a proximity operator, and the constraint set is equipped with a self-concordant barrier. Our main contribution is a new re-parametrization of the optimality condition of the barrier problem, that allows us to process the objective function with its proximal operator within a new path following scheme. In particular, our approach relies on the following two main ideas. First, we re-parameterize the optimality condition as an auxiliary problem, such that a "good" initial point is available. Second, we combine the proximal operator of the objective and path-following ideas to design a single phase, proximal, path-following algorithm. Our method has several advantages. First, it allows handling non-smooth objectives via proximal operators, this avoids lifting the problem dimension via slack variables and additional constraints. Second, it consists of only a \emph{single phase} as compared to a two-phase algorithm in [43] In this work, we show how to overcome this difficulty in the proximal setting and prove that our scheme has the same O(ν√log(1/ε)) worst-case iteration-complexity with standard approaches [30, 33], but our method can handle nonsmooth objectives, where ν is the barrier parameter and ε is a desired accuracy. Finally, our framework allows errors in the calculation of proximal-Newton search directions, without sacrificing the worst-case iteration complexity. We demonstrate the merits of our algorithm via three numerical examples, where proximal operators play a key role to improve the performance over off-the-shelf interior-point solvers.