Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Vizing’s theorem guarantees that every graph with maximum degree Δ admits an edge coloring using Δ+1 colors. In online settings-where edges arrive one at a time and must be colored immediately-a simple greedy algorithm uses at most 2Δ−1 colors. Over thirty years ago, Bar-Noy, Motwani, and Naor [IPL’92] proved that this guarantee is optimal among deterministic algorithms when Δ=O(logn), and among randomized algorithms when Δ=O(logn−−−−√). While deterministic improvements seemed out of reach, they conjectured that for graphs with Δ=ω(logn), randomized algorithms can achieve (1+o(1))Δ edge coloring. This conjecture was recently resolved in the affirmative: a (1+o(1))Δ coloring is achievable online using randomization for all graphs with Δ=ω(logn) [BSVW STOC’24]. Our results go further, uncovering two findings not predicted by the original conjecture. First, we give a deterministic online algorithm achieving (1+o(1))Δ-colorings for all Δ=ω(logn). Second, we give a randomized algorithm achieving (1+o(1))Δ colorings already when Δ=ω(logn−−−−√). Our results establish sharp thresholds for when greedy can be surpassed, and nearoptimal guarantees can be achieved - matching the impossibility results of [BNMN IPL’92], both deterministically and randomly.