Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Objective: Time-domain diffuse optical imaging (DOI) requires accurate forward models for photon propagation in scattering media. However, existing simulators lack comprehensive experimental validation, especially for non-contact configurations with oblique illumination. This study rigorously evaluates three widely used open-source simulators, including MMC (Mesh-based Monte Carlo), NIRFASTer, and Toast++ (the latter two are finite-element method (FEM)-based), using time-resolved experimental data. Approach: All simulations employed a unified mesh and point-source illumination. Virtual source approximation was applied to FEM solvers to reconcile the directional oblique beam with the isotropic diffusion equation. A time-resolved DOI system with a 32 × 32 single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) array acquired transmission-mode data from 16 standardized phantoms certified under the BIP protocol with varying absorption coefficient μ_a and reduced scattering coefficient μ_s'. The simulation results were quantified across five metrics: spatial-domain (SD) accuracy, time-domain (TD) accuracy, oblique beam accuracy, computational speed, and mesh-density independence. To further quantify the simulators’ practical applicability, optical property recovery was conducted using a grid-search optimization. Results: Among the three simulators, MMC achieves superior accuracy in SD and TD metrics (SD MSE: 0.072 ± 0.053; TD MSE: 0.179 ± 0.080), and shows robustness across all optical properties. NIRFASTer and Toast++ demonstrate comparable overall performance. In general, MMC is optimal for accuracy-critical TD-DOI applications, while NIRFASTer and Toast++ suit scenarios prioritizing speed (e.g., image reconstruction) with sufficiently large μ_s'. Besides, virtual source approximation is essential for non-contact FEM modeling, which reduced average errors by > 34% in large-angle scenarios. Significance: This work suggests a simplified framework for balancing simulation fidelity and computational speed through optimized solver selection and configuration, facilitating fast prototyping of novel TD-DOI systems. Our work represents the first study to systematically validate TD simulators against SPAD array-based data under clinically relevant non-contact conditions, bridging a critical gap in biomedical optical simulation standards.