Posez n’importe quelle question sur les cours, conférences, exercices, recherches, actualités, etc. de l’EPFL ou essayez les exemples de questions ci-dessous.
AVERTISSEMENT : Le chatbot Graph n'est pas programmé pour fournir des réponses explicites ou catégoriques à vos questions. Il transforme plutôt vos questions en demandes API qui sont distribuées aux différents services informatiques officiellement administrés par l'EPFL. Son but est uniquement de collecter et de recommander des références pertinentes à des contenus que vous pouvez explorer pour vous aider à répondre à vos questions.
Inhibitory GABAergic interneurons have been extensively studied but their contribution to circuit dynamics remain poorly understood. Although it has been suggested that interneurons, especially those belonging to the same subclass, synchronize their activity and impart this synchrony onto their local network, recent theoretical and experimental work have challenged this view. To better understand the activity of interneurons during cortical activity, we combined molecular identification, two-photon imaging, and electrophysiological recordings in thalamocortical slices from mouse somatosensory cortex. Using calcium imaging to monitor cortical activity, we found low spiking correlations among parvalbumin or somatostatin interneurons during cortical UP states, indicating that interneurons do not synchronize their firing. Intracellular recordings confirmed that nearby interneurons do not display more synchronous spiking than excitatory cells. The lack of interneuron synchrony was also evident during slow oscillations, even among interneurons that were electrically coupled via gap junctions, suggesting that their coupling does not function to synchronize their activity. Using voltage-clamp recordings from nearby pyramidal cells, we found that inhibitory currents (IPSCs) are more correlated than excitatory ones, but that correlated IPSCs arise from the activation of common presynaptic inhibitory cells, rather than from synchronization of interneuron activity. Finally, we demonstrate that pharmacologically reducing inhibitory currents increases correlated excitatory activity. We conclude that inhibitory interneurons do not have synchronous activity during UP states, and that their function may be to decorrelate rather than to synchronize the firing of neurons within the local network.
Michael Reimann, András Ecker, James Bryden Isbister, Daniela Egas Santander, Sirio Bolaños Puchet
Henry Markram, Kathryn Hess Bellwald, Felix Schürmann, Daniel Keller, Eilif Benjamin Muller, Werner Alfons Hilda Van Geit, Michael Reimann, Matthias Wolf, Lida Kanari, Srikanth Ramaswamy, James Gonzalo King, Alexis Arnaudon, Ying Shi, András Ecker, Jean-Denis Georges Emile Courcol, Armando Romani, Pramod Shivaji Kumbhar, Fernando Joaquim Leite Pereira, Michael Emiel Gevaert, Judit Planas Carbonell, James Bryden Isbister, Huanxiang Lu, Daniela Egas Santander, Sirio Bolaños Puchet, Juan Bautista Hernando Vieites, Samuel Lieven D. Lapere, Joni Henrikki Herttuainen, Cyrille Pierre Henri Favreau, Christoph Pokorny, Benoît Jean-Albert Coste, Vishal Sood, Thomas Brice Delemontex, Adrien Michel Achille Devresse, Nicolas René Jean Ninin, Alexander Dietz, Gianluca Ficarelli, Hugo Thabo Dictus
Eilif Benjamin Muller, Michael Reimann, Marwan Muhammad Ahmed Abdellah, James Gonzalo King, András Ecker, Pramod Shivaji Kumbhar, Giuseppe Chindemi, James Bryden Isbister, Daniela Egas Santander, Sirio Bolaños Puchet, Ioannis Magkanaris, Jorge Blanco Alonso