Free will in theology is an important part of the debate on free will in general. Religions vary greatly in their response to the standard argument against free will and thus might appeal to any number of responses to the paradox of free will, the claim that omniscience and free will are incompatible. Argument from free will The theological doctrine of divine foreknowledge is often alleged to be in conflict with free will, particularly in Calvinistic circles: if God knows exactly what will happen (right down to every choice a person makes), it would seem that the "freedom" of these choices is called into question.
Discrete emotion theory is the claim that there is a small number of core emotions. For example, Silvan Tomkins (1962, 1963) concluded that there are nine basic affects which correspond with what we come to know as emotions: interest, enjoyment, surprise, distress, fear, anger, shame, dissmell (reaction to bad smell) and disgust. More recently, Carroll Izard at the University of Delaware factor analytically delineated 12 discrete emotions labeled: Interest, Joy, Surprise, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, Contempt, Self-Hostility, Fear, Shame, Shyness, and Guilt (as measured via his Differential Emotions Scale or DES-IV).
Le confinement inertiel électrostatique (en anglais Inertial electrostatic confinement ou IEC), ou plus simplement confinement électrostatique, est un procédé permettant, grâce à un champ électrostatique, de maintenir un plasma dans un volume suffisamment restreint, et à une température suffisamment élevée, de telle sorte que des réactions de fusion nucléaire puissent s'y produire. Le dispositif IEC le plus ancien et le plus connu est le fuseur de Farnsworth-Hirsch.