Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Uranium (U) in situ bioremediation has been investigated as a cost-effective strategy to tackle U contamination in the subsurface. While uraninite was believed to be the only product of bioreduction, numerous studies have revealed that noncrystalline U(IV) species (NCU(IV)) are dominant. This finding brings into question the effectiveness of bioremediation because NCU(IV) species are expected to be labile and susceptible to oxidation. Thus, understanding the stability of NCU(IV) in the environment is of crucial importance. Fe(II) minerals (such as FeS) are often associated with U(IV) in bioremediated or naturally reduced sediments. Their impact on the stability of NCU(IV) is not well understood. Here, we show that, at high dissolved oxygen concentrations, FeS accelerates NCU(IV) reoxidation. We hypothesize that either highly reactive ferric minerals or radical S species produced by the oxidation of FeS drive this rapid reoxidation of NCU(IV). Furthermore, we found evidence for the contribution of reactive oxygen species to NCU(IV) reoxidation. This work refines our understanding of the role of iron sulfide minerals in the stability of tetravalent uranium in the presence of oxygen in a field setting such as contaminated sites or uranium-bearing naturally reduced zones.