Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Motivation: Spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is an important biomarker for neurodegenerative and traumatic diseases. However, CSA measurements vary across MRI contrasts and imaging protocols, limiting its use in multi-center studies. Goal(s): The goal is to evaluate CSA variability using a novel contrast-agnostic segmentation method. Approach: We compared this method to the Spinal Cord Toolbox's DeepSeg, analyzing CSA across different sites, and MRI vendors. Additionally, we compared the segmentations in diverse datasets and pathologies. Results: The contrast-agnostic segmentation showed lower CSA variability, and superior performance in most cases, except for intramedullary cord compression, where the Spinal Cord Toolbox's DeepSeg was more accurate. Impact: The contrast-agnostic method yields reliable spinal cord CSA measurements, independent of MRI contrasts and vendors. This, combined with a soft segmentation output, can potentially detect subtle spinal cord atrophy in prospective multi-center cohorts.