Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
We present Lynx-robot, a quadruped, modular, compliant robot. It features an either directly actuated, singlejoint spine design, or an actively supported, passive compliant, multi-joint spine configuration. This study aims at characterizing these two, largely different spine concepts, for a bounding gait and a robot with a three-segmented, panthographic leg design. An earlier, similar-sized, bounding, quadruped robot with a two-segment leg design and a directly actuated, singlejoint spine design serves as a comparison robot, to study the effect of the leg design on speed and cost of transport, while keeping the spine design fixed. Both proposed spine designs (single rotatory, active and multi-joint compliant, activesupported) reach moderate, self-stable bounding speeds, with comparable power consumption values. Power measures indicate an advantage of the three-segment, panthographic leg design compared to the earlier shown two-segment, compliant leg design. I
Auke Ijspeert, Francesco Mondada