Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The electron self-exchange reaction FeCl(OH2)(5)(2+) + Fe(OH2)(6)(2+) -> Fe(OH2)(6)(2+) + FeCl(OH2)(5)(2+), proceeding via the inner-sphere pathway, was investigated with quantum chemical methods. Geometry and vibrational frequencies of the precursor/successor complex, (H2O)(5)(FeClFeII)-Cl-III(OH2)(5)(4+)/(H2O)(5)(FeClFeIII)-Cl-II(OH2)(5)(4+) (P/S), and the transition state, (H2O)(5)FeClFe(OH2)(5)(4+) (TS), were computed with the LC-BOP functional and CPCM hydration. Bent and linear structures were computed for the TS and P/S. The electronic coupling matrix element (H-ab) and the electronic energies were calculated with multistate extended general multiconfiguration quasi-degenerate second-order perturbation theory (XGMC-QDPT2) and spin-orbit configuration interaction (SO-CI). Since the Fe Fe distance changes considerably along the electron transfer step, the transformation P -> TS -> S, equations based on the hypothesis of a fixed donor-acceptor distance cannot be applied. Hence, the rate constant for the electron transfer step (k(et)) was calculated as described previously (Rotzinger, F. P. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 9923). k(et) is very fast, similar to 9.4 x 10(8-)6.6 x 10(9) s(-1) at 0 degrees C. The experimental rate constant of the title reaction (k) is much slower and controlled by the formation of the precursor complex. The substitution of a water ligand by FeCl(OH2)(5)(2+) at Fe(OH2)(6)(2+) is rate-determining.