Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
In committee of experts strategies, small datasets are extracted from a larger one and utilised for the training of multiple models. These models' predictions are then carefully weighted so as to obtain estimates which are dominated by the model(s) that are most informed in each domain of the data manifold. Here, we show how this divide-and-conquer philosophy provides an avenue in the making of machine learning potentials for atomistic systems, which is general across systems of different natures and efficiently scalable by construction. We benchmark this approach on various datasets and demonstrate that divide-and-conquer linear potentials are more accurate than their single model counterparts, while incurring little to no extra computational cost.|A divide-and-conquer strategy - where small datasets are extracted from a larger one and utilised to train multiple models, which are then carefully combined for prediction - provides an avenue for accurate machine learning potentials.