Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Circularity and sustainability assessments aligned with the UN SDGs, Circular Economy (CE), and ESG metrics are fast-paced real estate due diligence requirements. Enhancing sustainability benchmarks involves extending building component lifespans to reduce CO2 emissions and waste. Integrating components into a closed loop requires efficient reuse potential evaluation amid dynamic market trends, policy shifts, and technological advancements. Traditional reuse assessments rely on scarce, slowly trained experts and lack scalable digital means to extend their expertise.
The main research question is whether it is possible to develop an AI-driven Reuse Viability Index (RVI) to measure and predict the sustainable viability of building component reuse, classifying components by their reusability, drawing upon resource assessments, open data, market history, and cost-effectiveness without continuous expert interaction.
The design brief for the RVI is to:
The RVI extends the conventional profit-margin by integrating multiple dimensions of key indicators - economic, environmental, technical, and social - into a single weighted composite score.
The methodology employs an AI-centred workflow:
The RVI outputs a ready-to-use percentage score of reuse viability that repurposes profit into a sustainability benchmark by integrating SDG and CE frameworks, addressing reuse barriers within market dynamics, and providing updatable guidance for circular real estate decisions.
An analysis of pan-European reuse marketplaces showed that windows, doors, and certain structural elements score high on the RVI; components with high deconstruction costs hover around 50%, while bulk items require adequate transport volumes to ensure environmental benefits.
Expert surveys confirm that component-specific RVI scores match industry assessments, and ML models deliver stable predictions for dynamic RVI indicators. If modelled carefully, basic component data -