Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and wrought Ti6Al4V were compared from a tribocorrosion perspective in 0.9 % NaCl, distinguishing between mechanical and chemical (oxidative) wear through potential-controlled measurements. The aim was to elucidate the manufacturing- and potential-dependent tribocorrosion mechanisms in a saline environment. While both manufacturing methods resulted in excellent corrosion resistance, the LPBF titanium alloy exhibited a finer, distinct microstructure, higher microhardness, and greater tribocorrosion resistance under applied cathodic and anodic potentials in saline than the wrought alloy. More available slip systems, lower grain boundary density, easier crack formation and propagation at the oxide-subsurface interface, and more oxidized third-body particles were responsible for the higher mechanical and chemical volume loss of wrought samples. These features were related to the microstructural differences; the wrought titanium alloy consisted of a β phase, along with α phase, and a lower grain boundary density, whereas the LPBF alloy possessed α/α′ phases and a higher grain boundary density.