Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
A comparative analysis of a wide range of air-water flow properties was conducted for two types of phase-detection intrusive probes including fiber-optical and conductivity probes. Experiments were conducted on a stepped spillway model for a skimming flow discharge q = 0.478 m(2)/s and for Re = 4.7 105 in a flow region just downstream of the inception point of free-surface aeration and in the fully developed flow region. The comparison of a large number of key air-water flow properties showed a very close agreement for the two sensor types including void fraction, interfacial velocity and equivalent clear water flow depth enabling a direct comparison of past and future data collected with either phase-detection probe type. Minor differences were observed in terms of chord sizes, clustered properties and interparticle arrival times linked with the slightly smaller sensor size of the fiber-optical probe. The in-line positioning of the leading and trailing tips of the fiber-optical probe affected the trailing tip properties resulting in elevated turbulence intensities. An optimum dual-tip phase-detection probe design should consist of small probe tips positioned side-by-side. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
François Gallaire, Edouard Boujo, Yves-Marie François Ducimetière