Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Communication-induced checkpointing protocols that ensure rollback-dependency trackability (RDT) guarantee important properties to the recovery system without explicit coordination. However, to the best of our knowledge, there was no garbage collection algorithm for them which did not use some type of process synchronization, like time assumptions or reliable control message exchanges. This paper addresses the problem of garbage collection for RDT checkpointing protocols and presents an optimal solution for the case where coordination is done only by means of timestamps piggybacked in application messages. Our algorithm uses the same timestamps as off-the-shelf RDT protocols and ensures the tight upper bound on the number of uncollected checkpoints for each process during all the system execution.