Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
This work contributes to the fundamental understanding of fracture properties of Particle Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites (PRMMCs), by identifying the key microstructural parameters that control fracture. To this end, PRMMCs with a high volume fraction of ceramic reinforcement (40-60 vol.%) are produced by gas-pressure infiltration. These composites are considered as model ductile/brittle twophase materials in that (i): the particles are homogeneously distributed in the matrix, (ii): the matrix microstructure is kept simple, and (iii) the composites are free of processing defects. The reinforcements used are alumina (Al2O3) particles of various shape (angular, polygonal) and size (5 to 60 µm), and boron carbide (B4C) particles (5 to 60 µm). The matrix materials are (i): pure Al, (ii): Al-Cu2% alloy, and (iii): Al-Cu4.5% alloy, all being chosen in order to obtain a single-phase matrix (Cu in solid-solution for the Al-Cu alloys), and to minimize chemical reactivity with the reinforcement. Pure Al matrix composites exhibit marked R-curve behaviour; they are characterized by J-integral fracture testing. The fracture toughness increases with the interparticle distance. At a given particle size, polygonal Al2O3 particle composites are the toughest, followed by B4C particle composites, and by angular Al2O3 particle composites. Al-Cu matrix composites feature a flatter R-curve, and are tested by a Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) method: the chevron-notch test. Again, polygonal particles yield tougher composites than angular ones. In the as-cast condition, coarse intermetallics formed at the interface matrix/reinforcement during solidification are strongly detrimental to the toughness. After heat-treatment, on the other hand, toughness of the alloyed matrix composites is improved and increases as the matrix is strengthened by raising the Cu content in the matrix. Using an arrested-crack technique, it is found that the dominant micromechanisms of fracture of pure Al matrix composites are strongly dependent on the particle type, shape and size: the stronger the reinforcement, the more the crack tends to propagate by a ductile mechanism of nucleation, growth, and coalescence of micro-cavities. With weaker particles, cracking of the composite is promoted by premature particle cracking. A stereoscopic method coupled with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging is used to reconstruct the fracture surfaces in 3D. The final dimple size (diameter, depth) is found to depend on the microstructural length scale of the composites, i.e. the interparticle distance. Data obtained from two types of measurement (quantitative metallography, dimple depth) are used to estimate the local energy necessary to create the fracture profile, by using simple micromechanical models. At the global scale, surface strain fields are revealed by photoelasticity. The observed crack-tip strain fields are fully confirmed by 3D Finite Element (FE) computations. Although most of