Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Mobility is often a central problem for people having muscle weaknesses. The need for new devices to assist walking and walk related activities is therefore growing. Lower limb actuated orthoses have already proven their positive impact with paraplegic patients and are potentially promising for assisting people with weak muscles. However, the transfer from the existing systems of mobilization towards assistance implies several technical challenges as the seamless integration and the reduction of power consumption. In this paper two assistive orthoses which use different types of actuation mechanisms are presented and discussed. The first one is based on a ball screw and an excavator-like mechanism while the second one is based on a double differential actuation. Their technical capabilities are compared and contextualized for diverse activities. Objective characteristics such as the range of motion of the devices, the transparency, the maximal torque that they can provide or the RMS torque during cyclic trajectories are compared to point out which device is better adapted for specific situations.
Anthony Christopher Davison, Igor Rodionov
Yves Perriard, Yoan René Cyrille Civet, Paolo Germano, Thomas Guillaume Martinez, Alexis Boegli, Stefania Maria Aliki Konstantinidi, Quentin Philippe Mario De Menech
Yves Perriard, Yoan René Cyrille Civet, Thomas Guillaume Martinez, Stefania Maria Aliki Konstantinidi, Armando Matthieu Walter, Amine Benouhiba