Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Meta-learning is the core capability that enables intelligent systems to rapidly generalize their prior ex-perience to learn new tasks. In general, the optimization-based methods formalize the meta-learning as a bi-level optimization problem, that is a nested optimization framework, in which meta-parameters are optimized (or learned) at the outer-level, while the inner-level optimizes the task-specific parameters. In this paper, we introduce RMAML, a meta-learning method that enforces orthogonality constraints to the bi-level optimization problem. We develop a geometry aware framework that generalizes the bi-level optimization problem to the Riemannian (constrained) setting. Using the Riemannian operations such as orthogonal projection, retraction and parallel transport, the bi-level optimization is reformulated so that it respects the Riemannian geometry. Moreover, we observe that a superior stable optimization and an im-proved generalization ability can be achieved when the parameters and meta-parameters of the method are modeled using a Stiefel Manifold. We empirically show that RMAML can easily reach competitive performances against several state of the art algorithms for few-shot classification and consistently out-performs its Euclidean counterpart, MAML. For example, by using the geometry of the Stiefel manifold to structure the fully-connected layers in a deep neural network, a 7% increase in single-domain few-shot classification accuracy is achieved. For the cross-domain few-shot learning, RMAML outperforms MAML by up to 9% of accuracy. Our ablation study also demonstrates the effectiveness of RMAML over MAML in terms of higher accuracy with a reduced number of tasks and (or) inner-level updates.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.