Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Effective arterial elastance (E(a)), defined as the ratio of left ventricular (LV) end-systolic pressure and stroke volume, lumps the steady and pulsatile components of the arterial load in a concise way. Combined with E(max), the slope of the LV end-systolic pressure-volume relation, E(a)/E(max) has been used to assess heart-arterial coupling. A mathematical heart-arterial interaction model was used to study the effects of changes in peripheral resistance (R; 0.6-1.8 mmHg x ml(-1) x s) and total arterial compliance (C; 0.5-2.0 ml/mmHg) covering the human pathophysiological range. E(a), E(a)/E(max,) LV stroke work, and hydraulic power were calculated for all conditions. Multiple-linear regression analysis revealed a linear relation between E(a), R/T (where T is cycle length), and 1/C: E(a) = -0.13 + 1.02R/T + 0.31/C, indicating that R/T contributes about three times more to E(a) than arterial stiffness (1/C). It is demonstrated that different pathophysiological combinations of R and C may lead to the same E(a) and E(a)/E(max) but can result in differences of 10% in stroke work and 50% in maximal power.