Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Transfer function (TF) models are commonly used in palaeoecology for quantitative inference of environmental variables based on biological proxies. Although the existence of spatial structure is well established in ecology, existing TFs do not account for it. This suggests that model performance may be improved by accounting for spatial structure. Here we demonstrate this using basic and advanced methods - multiple linear regression (MLR), lasso regression, geographically weighted regression (GWR) and geographically weighted lasso (GWL) - using geographical distance and bioclimatic distance, respectively. We compared the performance of these models for reconstructing water table depth from testate amoeba communities, as commonly used in peatland palaeoecology. GWL and lasso models performed considerably better (23 %-30 % reduction in mean squared prediction error) than standard weighted average methods. We provide an R package for the two innovative spatial methods (GWR and GWL).