Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Can the physical knowledge put into hydrological models add information to predictions? Current practise in modelling suggests that this is indeed assumed to be the case, given that physically based models play an important role in science and engineering. However, a literal interpretation of data processing inequality applied to models as signal processors seems to say that models can only lose information, not add it. To avoid this apparent paradox we argue that model complexity should be considered in the equation. In this context it is proposed that an alternative formulation of the data processing inequality in terms of algorithmic information theory better captures the situation a hydrological modeler typically faces.