Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Motivation: At ultra-high field, magnetisation preparation should be adjusted to obtain an adequate FLAIR contrast. However, such optimisation of the pulse sequence and comparison between preparation types are missing. Goal(s): This work aimed to set a simulation framework to investigate the timing of the magnetisation preparation at 7T. T2 and double inversion recovery preparations were compared. Approach: Various preparation durations were investigated using simulations and measurements on healthy volunteers. Results: The image contrast obtained under simulation was experimentally validated. The T2-preparation gave the most promising contrast although the pulses were more prone to B0-inhomogeneity artefacts than the ones from the double inversion recovery preparation. Impact: We demonstrated that an adequate FLAIR contrast at 7T can be obtained by optimising magnetisation preparation. Simulations can be used to improve the sequence, such as optimising the magnetisation preparation and readout in terms of timings and flip angles.