Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
State-of-the-art database design tools rely on the query optimizer for comparing between physical design alternatives. Although it provides an appropriate cost model for physical design, query optimization is a computationally expensive process. The significant time consumed by optimizer invocations poses serious performance limitations for physical design tools, causing long running times, especially for large problem instances. So far it has been impossible to remove query optimization overhead without sacrificing cost estimation precision. Inaccuracies in query cost estimation are detrimental to the quality of physical design algorithms, as they increase the chances of “missing” good designs and consequently selecting sub-optimal ones. Precision loss and the resulting reduction in solution quality is particularly undesirable and it is the reason the query optimizer is used in the first place. In this paper we eliminate the tradeoff between query cost estimation accuracy and performance. We introduce the INdex Usage Model (INUM), a cost estimation technique that returns the same values that would have been returned by the optimizer, while being three orders of magnitude faster. Integrating INUM with existing index selection algorithms dramatically improves their running times without precision compromises.