Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
As the power industry considers moving from a deterministic paradigm to a stochastic one to clear the day-ahead market in systems with significant stochastic production, the following question arises: how should a stochastic clearing algorithm be formulated? Our analyses indicate that a three-stage stochastic approach is clearly superior to a two-stage one. To show this, we propose a model that includes three stages: the first one represents the day-ahead market, the second stage, the intraday market, and the third one, the real-time operation. The objective is to clear the day-ahead market, but with a prognosis of the future: the intraday market and the real-time operation. To assess the impact of the intraday market on the day-ahead outcomes, we compare the results obtained from the proposed model with those of a simpler but more common two-stage model, which represents the day-ahead market and the real-time operation.
Fernando Porté Agel, Corey Dean Markfort, Peter Andreas Brugger