Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Oxidative treatment of iodide-containing waters can form toxic iodinated disinfection byproducts (I-DBPs). To better understand the fate of iodine, kinetics, products, and stoichiometries for the reactions of ferrate(VI) with iodide (I-) and hypoiodous acid (HOI) were determined. Ferrate(VI) showed considerable reactivities to both I- and HOT with higher reactivities at lower pH. Interestingly, the reaction of ferrate(VI) with HOT (k = 6.0 X 10(3) M-1 s(-1) at pH 9) was much faster than with I- (k = 5.6 X 10(2) M-1 s(-1) at pH 9). The main reaction pathway during treatment of I--containing waters was the oxidation of to HOT and its further oxidation to IO3- by ferrate(VI). However, for pH > 9, the HOT disproportionation catalyzed by ferrate(VI) became an additional transformation pathway forming I- and IO3-. The reduction of HOI by hydrogen peroxide, the latter being produced from ferrate(VI) decomposition, also contributes to the I- regeneration in the pH range 9-11. A kinetic model was developed that could well simulate the fate of iodine in the ferrate(VI)-I- system. Overall, due to a rapid oxidation of I- to IO3- with short-lifetimes of HOI, ferrate(VI) oxidation appears to be a promising option for I-DBP mitigation during treatment of I--containing waters.
Benoît Jean Dominique Ferrari, Régis Lionel Vivien