Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
We review and compare different fluid-structure interaction (FSI) numerical methods in the context of heart modeling, aiming at assessing their computational ef-ficiency for cardiac numerical simulations and selecting the most appropriate method for heart FSI. Blood dynamics within the human heart is characterized by active mus-cular action, during both contraction and relaxation phases of the heartbeat. The effi-cient solution of the FSI problem in this context is challenging, due to the added-mass effect (caused by the comparable densities of fluid and solid, typical of biomechan-ics) and to the complexity, nonlinearity and anisotropy of cardiac consitutive laws. In this work, we review existing numerical coupling schemes for FSI in the two classes of strongly-coupled partitioned and monolithic schemes. The schemes are compared on numerical tests that mimic the flow regime characterizing the heartbeat in a hu-man ventricle, during both systole and diastole. Active mechanics is treated in both the active stress and active strain frameworks. Computational costs suggest the use of a monolithic method. We employ it to simulate a full heartbeat of a human ventricle, showing how it allows to efficiently obtain physiologically meaningful results.
Jean-Philippe Hogge, René Chavan, Avelino Mas Sanchez, Anastasia Xydou, Cinta Lucia Marraco Borderas, Daniel Birlan