Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
To meet the CO2 reduction targets and ensure sustainable energy supply, the development and deploy- ment of cost-competitive innovative low-carbon energy technologies is essential. To design and evaluate the competitiveness of such complex integrated energy conversion systems, a systematic thermo- environomic optimisation strategy for the consistent modelling, comparison and optimisation of fuel decarbonisation process options is developed. The environmental benefit and the energetic and eco- nomic costs are assessed for several carbon capture process options. The performance is systematically compared and the trade-offs are assessed to support decision-making and identify optimal process con- figurations with regard to the polygeneration of H2, electricity, heat and captured CO2. The importance of process integration in the synthesis of efficient decarbonisation processes is revealed. It appears that different process options are in competition when a carbon tax is introduced. The choice of the optimal configuration is defined by the priorities given to the different thermo-environomic criteria.
Marc Vielle, Sigit Pria Perdana
François Maréchal, Daniel Alexander Florez Orrego, Meire Ellen Gorete Ribeiro Domingos, Dareen Zuhir Omar Dardor