Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
This paper highlights some effects of an asymmetrical design on three phase multilevel inverters from a supply network point of view. The investigated topology is based on a series connection of single phase inverters (partial cell) in each phase. Each partial cell is fed through a three-phase diode rectifier for a unidirectional power flow, fed itself through the secondary of the power transformer (PT). From analytical relationships in continuous and discontinuous current conduction mode, it’s shown that a symmetrical multilevel inverter has a smaller total harmonic distortion than an asymmetrical multilevel inverter (AMI) with the same number of partial cells per phase. An AMI is not more interesting than a classical three phase inverter. The total harmonic distortion of an AMI is compatible to the recommended IEEE std 519-1992 for all feeding possibilities for a given number of partial cells per phase. In order to exploit the main advantages of an asymmetrical design from a load point of view (generation of a high resolution voltage phasor, reduction of the number of power devices for the same resolution, flexibility for the dc-voltage feeding choice), a new solution is investigated : A symmetrical PT feeds an AMI.