Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The use of discrete choice models (DCMs) is a regular approach to investigating migration aspirations concerning destination choices. However, given the complex substitution patterns between destinations, more advanced model specifications than the multinomial logit (MNL) and nested logit (NL) models which are commonly found in the literature are required. The cross-nested logit (CNL) model allows for a more sophisticated representation of the stochastic structure of destination choices, through the use of overlapping nests while it is also addressing deviations from the property of independence of irrelevant alternatives. However, the shift towards CNL does not come without a cost; these models can be computationally expensive to estimate, especially as the number of observations increases. The estimation speed can be mitigated though via sampling of alternatives i.e. reducing the number of alternatives in the model specification. This method has been previously used mostly in the context of residential choice location. In the current work, we implement sampling of alternatives on migration aspiration choices using the Gallup World Poll data. We examine the impact of stratification and number of alternatives on the CNL model estimates. Moreover, we consider additional MNL and NL specifications to further understand the implications of sampling on DCMs used for modelling migration aspirations.
Claudia Rebeca Binder Signer, Matteo Barsanti