Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The reactivity of the cluster family [Ru-3(CO)(12-x)(L)x] (in which L = PMe3, PMe2Ph, PPh3 and PCy3, x = 1 - 3) towards hydrogen is described. When x=2, three isomers of [Ru-3(H)(mu-H)(CO)(9)(L)(2)] are formed, which differ in the arrangement of their equatorial phosphines. Kinetic studies reveal the presence of intra- and inter-isomer exchange processes with activation parameters and solvent effects indicating the involvement of ruthenium-ruthenium bond heterolysis and CO loss, respectively. When x = 3, reaction with H-2 proceeds to form identical products to those found with x = 2, while when x = 1 a single isomer of [Ru-3(H)(mu-H)(CO)(10)(L)] is formed. Species [Ru-3(H)(mu-H)(CO)(9)(L)(2)] have been shown to play a kinetically significant role in the hydrogenation of an alkyne substrate through initial CO loss, with rates of H-2 transfer being explicitly determined for each isomer. A less significant secondary reaction involving loss of L yields a detectable product that contains both a pendant vinyl unit and a bridging hydride ligand. Competing pathways that involve fragmentation to form [Ru(H)(2)(CO)(2)(L)(alkyne)] are also observed and shown to be favoured by nonpolar solvents. Kinetic data reveal that catalysis based on [Ru-3(CO)(10)(PPh3)(2)] is the most efficient although [Ru-3(H)(mu-H)(CO)(9)(PMe3)(2)] corresponds to the most active of the detected intermediates.