Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
We consider a network of N coupled limit cycle oscillators, each having a set of control parameters Λ_k, k = 1, . . . , N, that controls the frequency and the geometry of the limit cycle. We implement a self-adaptive mechanism that drives the local systems to share a common set of parameters Λ_c. This situation therefore strongly differs from classical synchronization problems where the Λ_k are kept constant. The deformations of the Λ_k towards the consensual Λ_k are “plastic” - once Λ_c is reached, it remains permanent even in absence of interactions. Again, this has to be contrasted with classical synchronization which does not affect the Λ_k (in the absence of interactions, individual behaviors are restored). The resulting consensual Λ_c can be analytically characterized. In general, the set of initial conditions from which Λ_c is reached depends on the network topology. The class of models discussed here unveil the basic features necessary to construct a wider class of dynamical system sharing self-adaptive attractor-shaping capability. Finally, we present numerical simulations that corroborate our theoretical assertions.
Louise Clothilde Coppieters De Gibson
Romain Christophe Rémy Fleury, Benjamin Apffel
Tatiana Pieloni, Davide Di Croce, Mike Seidel