Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Accurately representing mixed-phase clouds (MPCs) in global climate models (GCMs) is critical for capturing climate sensitivity and Arctic amplification. Secondary ice production (SIP), can significantly increase ice crystal number concentration (ICNC) in MPCs, affecting cloud properties and processes. Here, we introduce a machine-learning (ML) approach, called Random Forest SIP (RaFSIP), to parameterize SIP in stratiform MPCs. RaFSIP is trained on 16 grid points with 10-km horizontal spacing derived from a 2-year simulation with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, including explicit SIP microphysics. Designed for a temperature range of 0 to -25 degrees C, RaFSIP simplifies the description of rime splintering, ice-ice collisional break-up, and droplet-shattering using only a limited set of inputs. RaFSIP was evaluated offline before being integrated into WRF, demonstrating its stable online performance in a 1-year simulation keeping the same model setup as during training. Even when coupled with the 50-km grid spacing domain of WRF, RaFSIP reproduces ICNC predictions within a factor of 3 when compared to simulations with explicit SIP microphysics. The coupled WRF-RaFSIP scheme replicates regions of enhanced SIP and accurately maps ICNCs and liquid water content, particularly at temperatures above -10 degrees C. Uncertainties in RaFSIP minimally impact surface cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic, resulting in radiative biases under 3 Wm-2 compared to simulations with detailed microphysics. Although the performance of RaFSIP in convective clouds remains untested, its adaptable nature allows for data set augmentation to address this aspect. This framework opens possibilities for GCM simplification and process description through physics-guided ML algorithms.|Being able to correctly simulate the amount of ice and liquid in clouds is essential for accurate predictions of the cloud radiative forcing in the climatologically sensitive polar regions. A number of collisional processes between ice and liquid particles in clouds, known as secondary ice production, can significantly enhance the ice crystal number concentrations contained in them. This enhancement is often accompanied by a decrease in the cloud liquid water content, resulting in less opaque clouds to incoming solar radiation, which, in turn, can cause a cloud-induced warming at the surface. Currently most global climate models are missing the description of the most important secondary ice production processes, which can lead to a biased radiative impact of clouds at the surface. To address this, we propose using a machine learning algorithm trained on high-resolution model outputs to include the effect of ice multiplication in large-scale climate models. The machine learning framework effectively captures the physical processes underlying secondary ice production in stratiform clouds using only a few inputs readily available in model frameworks. This approach has the potential
Charlotte Grossiord, Giovanni Bortolami
Athanasios Nenes, Alexis Berne, Satoshi Takahama, Georgia Sotiropoulou, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Anne-Claire Marie Billault--Roux, Kunfeng Gao, Romanos Foskinis