Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Studies in support of the assessment of aging structural materials in pressurized water reactors are being performed at the Paul Scherrer Institut. To that aim, a state-of-the-art methodology based on applying a CASMO-4/SIMULATE-3/MCNPX calculation scheme has been developed. In the frame of the methodology validation, an investigation is currently reported pertaining to the sensitivity of the calculated results, for a specific reactor pressure vessel scraping test, to the nuclear data used with the Monte Carlo code. Thus, the MCNPX-2.4.0 calculations have been carried out using three different data libraries, based on JEF-2.2, ENDF/B-VI.8 and JENDL-3.3 evaluations, respectively.A significant discrepancy (~10%) in fast neutron flux (E1MeV) estimations has been observed between the results obtained with JENDL-3.3, versus the two other libraries, while noting that the later both provide very satisfactory agreement (within 5%) with the reference results based on the experimental data. Subsequent analysis has indicated that the observed discrepancy can be attributed mostly to differences in the oxygen data. The discussed cross-section differences could potentially lead to more sizable discrepancies for other applications, and thus need to be brought to the attention of neutron data evaluators and users.[All rights reserved Elsevier].
Vincent Pierre Lamirand, Oskari Ville Pakari
Andreas Pautz, Vincent Pierre Lamirand, Oskari Ville Pakari, Pavel Frajtag, Tom Mager
Sophie Danielle Angelica Gorno