Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
We show a close connection between structural hardness for k-partite graphs and tight inapproximability results for scheduling problems with precedence constraints. Assuming a natural but nontrivial generalisation of the bipartite structural hardness result of [1], we obtain a hardness of 2 - epsilon for the problem of minimising the makespan for scheduling precedence-constrained jobs with preemption on identical parallel machines. This matches the best approximation guarantee for this problem [6,4]. Assuming the same hypothesis, we also obtain a super constant inapproximability result for the problem of scheduling precedence-constrained jobs on related parallel machines, making progress towards settling an open question in both lists of ten open questions by Williamson and Shmoys [17], and by Schuurman and Woeginger [14]. The study of structural hardness of k-partite graphs is of independent interest, as it captures the intrinsic hardness for a large family of scheduling problems. Other than the ones already mentioned, this generalisation also implies tight inapproximability to the problem of minimising the weighted completion time for precedence-constrained jobs on a single machine, and the problem of minimising the makespan of precedenceconstrained jobs on identical parallel machine, and hence unifying the results of Bansal and Khot[1] and Svensson [15], respectively.