Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is designed to curb the 12%-17% of global greenhouse emissions from forests. Though the mechanism emanated from international UN climate platform, the implementation is realized locally. This has implications for present activities of local communities/Indigenous Peoples who depend on these lands and forests. In addition, the livelihoods and land use decisions of the communities will interface with REDD+. The impacts both REDD+ and livelihood objectives may mutually produce, challenges the dichotomous perspectives of a carbon-centric REDD+. In localizing international REDD+ decisions, it is crucial that stakeholders participate within the design and processes of a mechanism that invariably (re)shapes power relations and affects their interests in the forest resource. Using Ghana's REDD+ 'readiness' process, this paper examines stakeholder participation in the programme. The paper explores and analyses the views of Ghanaian REDD+ stakeholders on participation; how stakeholder groups assert their influence in the process and makes a case for the need to have effective participation for sustainable REDD+ and associated development.