Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
The present study aimed to compare sleep disordered breathing during live high-train low (LHTL) altitude camp using normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH). Sixteen highly trained triathletes completed two 18-day LHTL camps in a crossover designed study. They trained at 1100-1200 m while they slept either in NH at a simulated altitude of 2250 m or in HH. Breathing frequency and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) were recorded continuously during all nights and oxygen desaturation index (ODI 3%) calculated. Breathing frequency was lower for NH than HH during the camps (14.6 +/- 3.1 breath x min(-1) vs. 17.2 +/- 3.4 breath x min(-1), p < 0.001). SpO(2) was lower for HH than NH (90.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 91.9 +/- 0.2, p < 0.001) and ODI 3% was higher for HH than NH (15.1 +/- 3.5 vs. 9.9 +/- 1.6, p < 0.001). Sleep in moderate HH is more altered than in NH during a LHTL camp.
Kamiar Aminian, Pritish Chakravarty
Maria del Carmen Sandi Perez, Olivia Zanoletti, Jocelin Grosse, Simone Astori, Marie-Isabelle Guillot de Suduiraut, Sophie Elizabeth Walker, Silvia Monari